The efficiency ratio measures non-interest expenses (think salaries, tech investments, and snacks in the breakroom) relative to revenue. A higher ratio? Not so efficient. A lower ratio? You’re probably running a tighter ship.
And here’s the kicker: mid-sized banks with assets between $3 billion and $20 billion have been riding the efficiency ratio rollercoaster in recent years, and it’s not exactly thrilling.
Take a look at the chart below, which tracks how efficiency ratios have changed year after year from 2019 through 2023 (side note: yes, there’s some COVID-era noise in here, but we’ll roll with it):
The x-axis (horizontal) shows asset size in millions of USD, while the y-axis (vertical) shows the average of how efficiency ratios changed from the previous year.
A positive number means that the efficiency ratio has increased – that is, non-interest costs like personnel and technology grew faster than revenues. For example, The efficiency ratio of a bank with $5 billion in assets (the first point in the chart) will grow ~2.2% per year on average. That is… next year, they will be a little less efficient than this year, and the year after that, even less.
And yes, as soon as banks cross the $10 billion mark, their costs start to grow like there is no tomorrow.
A lot of this cost creep is because once these banks cross that magical $10 billion threshold, the regulatory monster rears its head. Compliance costs explode, throwing a wrench into everyone’s carefully laid growth plans.
This continues until compliance initiatives stabilize and economies of scale (finally, mercifully) kick in.
It’s a bit like running up a very expensive hill in the hope there’s a downhill stretch eventually.
Here’s where it gets baffling. You’d think banks would go all-in on aggressive growth strategies during this awkward regulatory puberty phase, right? Wrong! The data shows growth actually slows once banks hit roughly $13 billion in assets and continues decelerating thereafter (cue dramatic music). While they should be prioritizing growth to shed the weight of these compliance costs faster, many banks end up wandering in the wilderness.
So, what’s tripping up these would-be titans of banking? Well, it turns out there are a few key reasons
In short, despite all the fancy talk about growth, banks stumble into this awkward asset phase unprepared, under-resourced, and a little too distracted.
Ah, glad you asked.
A little preparation goes a long way. It’s time to channel your inner Joseph from the Bible—you know, the guy who predicted seven years of fat cows (good times), followed by seven years of skinny cows (not so good times).
Banks hovering around the $10 billion mark should treat their “fat cow” years as a chance to get ready for the “skinny cow” years lurking on the other side of that regulatory cliff.
Here’s how to gear up before things get messy:
I would love to hear about how you are preparing for this growth in the comments below.
Let us help you achieve greater and more profitable growth HERE.